<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book Review: South Park Conservatives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://txfx.net/2005/04/22/book-review-south-park-conservatives/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://txfx.net/2005/04/22/book-review-south-park-conservatives/</link>
	<description>Mark Jaquith&#039;s blog about capitalism, freedom, WordPress, the web, and personal topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 07:17:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta4-20838</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: South Park Conservatives: The Revolt Against Liberal Media Bias</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/04/22/book-review-south-park-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-8692</link>
		<dc:creator>South Park Conservatives: The Revolt Against Liberal Media Bias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/04/22/book-review-south-park-conservatives/#comment-8692</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Book Review: South Park Conservatives, Tempus Fugit, April 22, 2005 [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] Book Review: South Park Conservatives, Tempus Fugit, April 22, 2005 [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/04/22/book-review-south-park-conservatives/comment-page-1/#comment-6172</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2005 00:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/04/22/book-review-south-park-conservatives/#comment-6172</guid>
		<description>Nice review Mark.  I think I&#039;m going to have to pick up the book.

I often wonder if &quot;the right&quot; isn&#039;t defined as being more socially conservative or religious than it really is because that&#039;s how liberals, and thus the majority of the media, see it from the outside.

Which isn&#039;t to say that there aren&#039;t moralists and deeply religous people on the right, I just think its a mistake to allow that sort of thing to define the movement.

I also like the idea that the uniting force behind the current coalition of neo-libertarians/conservatives/social conservatives, etc. is a rejection of what &lt;em&gt;liberalism&lt;/em&gt; stands for.

I honestly think that, on a trend going out 50 years or so, liberalism as we know it today will slowly die out and the new political divide will arise between the the neo-libertarians and the more socially conservative types.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review Mark.  I think I&#8217;m going to have to pick up the book.</p>
<p>I often wonder if &#8220;the right&#8221; isn&#8217;t defined as being more socially conservative or religious than it really is because that&#8217;s how liberals, and thus the majority of the media, see it from the outside.</p>
<p>Which isn&#8217;t to say that there aren&#8217;t moralists and deeply religous people on the right, I just think its a mistake to allow that sort of thing to define the movement.</p>
<p>I also like the idea that the uniting force behind the current coalition of neo-libertarians/conservatives/social conservatives, etc. is a rejection of what <em>liberalism</em> stands for.</p>
<p>I honestly think that, on a trend going out 50 years or so, liberalism as we know it today will slowly die out and the new political divide will arise between the the neo-libertarians and the more socially conservative types.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

