<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legalizing Pot Would Net $13.9 Billion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/</link>
	<description>Mark Jaquith&#039;s blog about capitalism, freedom, WordPress, the web, and personal topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 07:17:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta4-20838</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legalizing Pot - Dogpile Web Search</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-451520</link>
		<dc:creator>Legalizing Pot - Dogpile Web Search</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/#comment-451520</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...]      www.forbes.com/2005/06/02/cz_qh_0602pot.html  [Found on Windows Live, Yahoo! Search]     8.  Legalizing Pot Would Net $13.9 Billion [ Tempus Fugit &#124; TxFx.net ]    Legalizing Pot Would Net $13.9 Billion. Legalizing marijuana and taxing it would net the [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...]      <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2005/06/02/cz_qh_0602pot.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.forbes.com/2005/06/02/cz_qh_0602pot.html</a>  [Found on Windows Live, Yahoo! Search]     8.  Legalizing Pot Would Net $13.9 Billion [ Tempus Fugit | TxFx.net ]    Legalizing Pot Would Net $13.9 Billion. Legalizing marijuana and taxing it would net the [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shara Richards</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-156154</link>
		<dc:creator>Shara Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 20:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/#comment-156154</guid>
		<description>Hello  my name is Shara Richards I know the good work that you can do and we need your assistance to spread the word americawillbebetter.com This site is a detailed plan of action for an unfinished nation which is a common sense approach to fix the things that are wrong with our government such as the social security system,needing universal insurance,making our politicians accountable,lowering the gas prices, raising minimum wage, prison reform, social reform, educational reforms, getting more equal rights for the people in our country and including a way to legitimately legalize marijuana across the board. We need you to help us spread the word that americawillbebetter.com we are organizing mass national protest to show the power of the American people when we unite. When we all make a stand for what we want then we can accomplish anything We believe every person can make a difference and that is what we want to do is to make change in America through the American people and we believe that together we can spread the word americawillbebetter.com please take a look, thank you for your time and have a nice day.
A concerned citizen 
Shara Rena Richards  
shararena@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello  my name is Shara Richards I know the good work that you can do and we need your assistance to spread the word americawillbebetter.com This site is a detailed plan of action for an unfinished nation which is a common sense approach to fix the things that are wrong with our government such as the social security system,needing universal insurance,making our politicians accountable,lowering the gas prices, raising minimum wage, prison reform, social reform, educational reforms, getting more equal rights for the people in our country and including a way to legitimately legalize marijuana across the board. We need you to help us spread the word that americawillbebetter.com we are organizing mass national protest to show the power of the American people when we unite. When we all make a stand for what we want then we can accomplish anything We believe every person can make a difference and that is what we want to do is to make change in America through the American people and we believe that together we can spread the word americawillbebetter.com please take a look, thank you for your time and have a nice day.<br />
A concerned citizen<br />
Shara Rena Richards<br />
<a href="mailto:shararena@yahoo.com">shararena@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Ballard</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-89811</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Ballard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 19:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/#comment-89811</guid>
		<description>i thank that they should legalize pot beacuse it helps people with cancer or stress</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i thank that they should legalize pot beacuse it helps people with cancer or stress</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vonna</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-7508</link>
		<dc:creator>Vonna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 23:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/#comment-7508</guid>
		<description>A question
What are we to do about people coming into the country under medicinal pot from abroad?? I can&#039;t believe our country can&#039;t tell the diffrence between a criminal and a sick person....Imagine if it was legalized....my how the drug companies scramble for land and cultivators</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question<br />
What are we to do about people coming into the country under medicinal pot from abroad?? I can&#8217;t believe our country can&#8217;t tell the diffrence between a criminal and a sick person&#8230;.Imagine if it was legalized&#8230;.my how the drug companies scramble for land and cultivators</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-7401</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 20:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/#comment-7401</guid>
		<description>Maxwell, I believe those long term tests use hair... which can be cut off.  In any case, marijuana is detectable in the blood and there are standards as to what level indicates that you are under the influence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maxwell, I believe those long term tests use hair&#8230; which can be cut off.  In any case, marijuana is detectable in the blood and there are standards as to what level indicates that you are under the influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maxwell</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-7400</link>
		<dc:creator>Maxwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 18:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/#comment-7400</guid>
		<description>If you are really worried about testing for use of marijuana its actually easier as residue is still traceable long after you have smoked it. You can still detect it up to ten years after your last contact with it compare that to alcohol which is about 12 hours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are really worried about testing for use of marijuana its actually easier as residue is still traceable long after you have smoked it. You can still detect it up to ten years after your last contact with it compare that to alcohol which is about 12 hours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-6853</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 06:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/#comment-6853</guid>
		<description>Marijuana was made illegal in 1937.  According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marijuana_Tax_Act&quot;&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The bill was passed on the grounds that marijuana caused &quot;Murder, insanity and death&quot;. Today, it is generally accepted that marijuana caused none of these, and in 1951 Harry Anslinger himself claimed that he had no evidence to support that thesis. However, new reasons had emerged by then, which pushed through a bill that outdated the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937.

The Act is often used by advocates of the decriminalization of marijuana, as now it has become apparent that it was based mostly on racism and wild, entirely unsupported claims. For example, Harry Anslinger said that &quot;Marijuana makes darkies think they&#039;re as good as white men&quot;.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marijuana was made illegal in 1937.  According to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marijuana_Tax_Act">Wikipedia</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The bill was passed on the grounds that marijuana caused &#8220;Murder, insanity and death&#8221;. Today, it is generally accepted that marijuana caused none of these, and in 1951 Harry Anslinger himself claimed that he had no evidence to support that thesis. However, new reasons had emerged by then, which pushed through a bill that outdated the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937.</p>
<p>The Act is often used by advocates of the decriminalization of marijuana, as now it has become apparent that it was based mostly on racism and wild, entirely unsupported claims. For example, Harry Anslinger said that &#8220;Marijuana makes darkies think they&#8217;re as good as white men&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-6852</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 06:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/#comment-6852</guid>
		<description>But isn&#039;t the reason a substance is illegal is due to the &quot;bad&quot; outweighing its &quot;good&quot;? I&#039;m sure they didn&#039;t just say, marijuana is too hard to control so lets just make it illegal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But isn&#8217;t the reason a substance is illegal is due to the &#8220;bad&#8221; outweighing its &#8220;good&#8221;? I&#8217;m sure they didn&#8217;t just say, marijuana is too hard to control so lets just make it illegal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-6851</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 04:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/#comment-6851</guid>
		<description>Instead of testing for drugs, why not test for symptoms?  I mean, a .05 BAC isn&#039;t a problem unless it&#039;s affecting your motor skills.  It&#039;s like it is now if you&#039;re driving and have been smoking pot.  Your driving will show it, you&#039;ll be pulled over, and you&#039;ll appear to be under the influence and arrested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of testing for drugs, why not test for symptoms?  I mean, a .05 BAC isn&#8217;t a problem unless it&#8217;s affecting your motor skills.  It&#8217;s like it is now if you&#8217;re driving and have been smoking pot.  Your driving will show it, you&#8217;ll be pulled over, and you&#8217;ll appear to be under the influence and arrested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles W. Stricklin</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-6850</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles W. Stricklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 04:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/#comment-6850</guid>
		<description>Also, what about screening for jobs like pilots and drivers? Alcohol tests measure blood alcohol rates at the time they were taken, while drug tests show presence or absence of marijuana over a prolonged period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, what about screening for jobs like pilots and drivers? Alcohol tests measure blood alcohol rates at the time they were taken, while drug tests show presence or absence of marijuana over a prolonged period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-6847</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 00:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/#comment-6847</guid>
		<description>No doubt, there is an underground market for (tobacco) cigarettes, but how much of a problem is that, really?  When given a choice between a slight price advantage, and a legitimate customer base, which do you think they&#039;d choose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt, there is an underground market for (tobacco) cigarettes, but how much of a problem is that, really?  When given a choice between a slight price advantage, and a legitimate customer base, which do you think they&#8217;d choose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles W. Stricklin</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-6845</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles W. Stricklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2005 23:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/#comment-6845</guid>
		<description>The $7.7 billion would &quot;saved&quot; by ending enforcement of marijuana laws would likely be reallocated to the enforcement of other controlled substances, and the $6.2 billion gained by taxing the non-toxic herb assumes the best underground distribution system in the world could somehow be brought kicking and screaming into the mainstream.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The $7.7 billion would &#8220;saved&#8221; by ending enforcement of marijuana laws would likely be reallocated to the enforcement of other controlled substances, and the $6.2 billion gained by taxing the non-toxic herb assumes the best underground distribution system in the world could somehow be brought kicking and screaming into the mainstream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Say Anything</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-6844</link>
		<dc:creator>Say Anything</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2005 14:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/#comment-6844</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Good Reason For Legalizing Pot&lt;/strong&gt;


...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Good Reason For Legalizing Pot</strong></p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IO ERROR</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/comment-page-1/#comment-6843</link>
		<dc:creator>IO ERROR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2005 09:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/06/05/legalizing-pot-would-net-139-billion/#comment-6843</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Milton Friedman and 500 economists agree: Legalize marijuana&lt;/strong&gt;

	From Forbes comes the story of a report on the costs of marijuana prohibition.
	Dr. Jeffrey Miron, visiting professor of economics at Harvard University, estimates that replacing marijuana prohibition with a system of taxation and regulation similar t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Milton Friedman and 500 economists agree: Legalize marijuana</strong></p>
<p>	From Forbes comes the story of a report on the costs of marijuana prohibition.<br />
	Dr. Jeffrey Miron, visiting professor of economics at Harvard University, estimates that replacing marijuana prohibition with a system of taxation and regulation similar t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

