<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Most Qualified for the Job</title>
	<atom:link href="http://txfx.net/2005/10/12/most-qualified-for-the-job/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://txfx.net/2005/10/12/most-qualified-for-the-job/</link>
	<description>Mark Jaquith&#039;s blog about capitalism, freedom, WordPress, the web, and personal topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:11:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tempus Fugit Blog [ Tempus Fugit &#124; TxFx.net ]</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/10/12/most-qualified-for-the-job/comment-page-1/#comment-19099</link>
		<dc:creator>Tempus Fugit Blog [ Tempus Fugit &#124; TxFx.net ]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 02:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/10/12/most-qualified-for-the-job/#comment-19099</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt; have sparked no such controversy (although Malkin mentions it in passing). It has been made abundantly clear to me that Miers wasn&#039;t the best choice, but the best female choice, in the mind of the President (or,as commenter Robert suggests, the best female choice who was willing to go through the mud-slinging of a confirmation hearing). In an interview so heavily tainted by blatant pro-female gender preferences, why is it the First Lady&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%--> have sparked no such controversy (although Malkin mentions it in passing). It has been made abundantly clear to me that Miers wasn&#8217;t the best choice, but the best female choice, in the mind of the President (or,as commenter Robert suggests, the best female choice who was willing to go through the mud-slinging of a confirmation hearing). In an interview so heavily tainted by blatant pro-female gender preferences, why is it the First Lady<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2005/10/12/most-qualified-for-the-job/comment-page-1/#comment-9718</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 14:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/2005/10/12/most-qualified-for-the-job/#comment-9718</guid>
		<description>Did you see the Drudge headline this morning? I am wondering if he went for Edith Clement or Janice Rogers Brown and they said &quot;HELL NO&quot; to being dragged through the mud. 

It is quite possible that what Bush should really be saying is &quot;She is the most qualified woman that would take the job.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you see the Drudge headline this morning? I am wondering if he went for Edith Clement or Janice Rogers Brown and they said &#8220;HELL NO&#8221; to being dragged through the mud. </p>
<p>It is quite possible that what Bush should really be saying is &#8220;She is the most qualified woman that would take the job.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

