<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCOTUS ruling on habeas corpus for Gitmo detainees outlines Bush administration failing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://txfx.net/2008/06/12/scotus-ruling-on-habeas-corpus-for-gitmo-detainees-outlines-bush-administration-failing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://txfx.net/2008/06/12/scotus-ruling-on-habeas-corpus-for-gitmo-detainees-outlines-bush-administration-failing/</link>
	<description>Mark Jaquith&#039;s blog about capitalism, freedom, WordPress, the web, and personal topics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 07:17:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta4-20838</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2008/06/12/scotus-ruling-on-habeas-corpus-for-gitmo-detainees-outlines-bush-administration-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-635869</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/?p=1662#comment-635869</guid>
		<description>No excuse necessary. I always notice the &quot;Freedom isn&#039;t free&quot; stickers.  I agree, but not in the way that they mean.  I agree in the way that you mean -- that the price of freedom is living in a world where crime isn&#039;t impossible.  In a world where the government fights crime with one hand tied behind its back -- the hand that if untethered would allow it to better strangle its law-abiding citizens.

The sticker usually means that they think soldiers dying in Iraq are paying the price for our freedom.  They aren&#039;t.  Few are paying the price of freedom right now.  Currently, freedom IS the price, and we&#039;re buying a little bit of security, a lot of security theater, and a whole lot of unnecessary government expansion.  It is for &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; that our soldiers are tragically dying.  So I support our troops in that I empathize with people who are following orders that, while they don&#039;t rise to the level that requires peaceful resistance, are hardly orders that are going to secure their place in history as great defenders of freedom.  But if by &quot;support our troops&quot; it is meant that I support keeping them unnecessarily in harm&#039;s way, then no, I don&#039;t support that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No excuse necessary. I always notice the &#8220;Freedom isn&#8217;t free&#8221; stickers.  I agree, but not in the way that they mean.  I agree in the way that you mean &#8212; that the price of freedom is living in a world where crime isn&#8217;t impossible.  In a world where the government fights crime with one hand tied behind its back &#8212; the hand that if untethered would allow it to better strangle its law-abiding citizens.</p>
<p>The sticker usually means that they think soldiers dying in Iraq are paying the price for our freedom.  They aren&#8217;t.  Few are paying the price of freedom right now.  Currently, freedom IS the price, and we&#8217;re buying a little bit of security, a lot of security theater, and a whole lot of unnecessary government expansion.  It is for <em>that</em> that our soldiers are tragically dying.  So I support our troops in that I empathize with people who are following orders that, while they don&#8217;t rise to the level that requires peaceful resistance, are hardly orders that are going to secure their place in history as great defenders of freedom.  But if by &#8220;support our troops&#8221; it is meant that I support keeping them unnecessarily in harm&#8217;s way, then no, I don&#8217;t support that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://txfx.net/2008/06/12/scotus-ruling-on-habeas-corpus-for-gitmo-detainees-outlines-bush-administration-failing/comment-page-1/#comment-635828</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txfx.net/?p=1662#comment-635828</guid>
		<description>My answer to: &#039;Justice Scalia’s dissent states that “[the decision] will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed.”&#039;

Hey, Tony! &quot;Freedom isn&#039;t free.&quot; Ain&#039;t that what youse neocons are saying all the time? Freedom entails some degree of risk, right? Want a risk-free, totally secure life? Move into a prison. But then, that&#039;s Justice Scalia&#039;s goal, isn&#039;t it?

If we define &quot;freedom&quot; the way folks like Scalia define &quot;freedom&quot;, then the slogan is literally correct: &quot;Freedom isn&#039;t free&quot;-- in exactly the way Orwell meant &quot;Freedom is slavery&quot; or &quot;War is peace&quot; or &quot;Ignorance is strength&quot;.

&quot;Freedom isn&#039;t free&quot; and &quot;Support the troops&quot; are examples of &quot;brilliant&quot; (ironic &#039;air quotes&#039; here) propaganda slogans that can mean whatever the sender needs them to mean while still manipulating the receiver into either actively supporting the sender&#039;s goals or at least self-neutering the dissenting receiver every time the receiver repeats the essentially empty slogan. Thus we had &quot;anti-war&quot; movement people (the confused liberal sort, anyway) neutering their own message each time they repeated the empty slogan &quot;of course we support the troops&quot; or the equally empty &quot;Peace is patriotic, too&quot; slogan or &quot;We have to recapture the US flag&quot;-- when patriotism/nationalism/empire is a large part of the problem they&#039;re facing and attempting to resist yet don&#039;t understand or won&#039;t admit.

(Please excuse the screed above. I happened upon your site after viewing your very useful &quot;My First Wordpress Plugin&quot; video. Very nice. Thanks.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My answer to: &#8216;Justice Scalia’s dissent states that “[the decision] will almost certainly cause more Americans to be killed.”&#8217;</p>
<p>Hey, Tony! &#8220;Freedom isn&#8217;t free.&#8221; Ain&#8217;t that what youse neocons are saying all the time? Freedom entails some degree of risk, right? Want a risk-free, totally secure life? Move into a prison. But then, that&#8217;s Justice Scalia&#8217;s goal, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>If we define &#8220;freedom&#8221; the way folks like Scalia define &#8220;freedom&#8221;, then the slogan is literally correct: &#8220;Freedom isn&#8217;t free&#8221;&#8211; in exactly the way Orwell meant &#8220;Freedom is slavery&#8221; or &#8220;War is peace&#8221; or &#8220;Ignorance is strength&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Freedom isn&#8217;t free&#8221; and &#8220;Support the troops&#8221; are examples of &#8220;brilliant&#8221; (ironic &#8216;air quotes&#8217; here) propaganda slogans that can mean whatever the sender needs them to mean while still manipulating the receiver into either actively supporting the sender&#8217;s goals or at least self-neutering the dissenting receiver every time the receiver repeats the essentially empty slogan. Thus we had &#8220;anti-war&#8221; movement people (the confused liberal sort, anyway) neutering their own message each time they repeated the empty slogan &#8220;of course we support the troops&#8221; or the equally empty &#8220;Peace is patriotic, too&#8221; slogan or &#8220;We have to recapture the US flag&#8221;&#8211; when patriotism/nationalism/empire is a large part of the problem they&#8217;re facing and attempting to resist yet don&#8217;t understand or won&#8217;t admit.</p>
<p>(Please excuse the screed above. I happened upon your site after viewing your very useful &#8220;My First WordPress Plugin&#8221; video. Very nice. Thanks.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

